PROJECT ORIGIN

What is Chat Control
and why does REVANGE exist?

This project didn't appear out of nowhere. Below is an honest explanation of the EU debate around Chat Control and how REVANGE — technically, not legally — responds to it.

WHAT IT IS

Chat Control, briefly

"Chat Control" is the common name for an EU regulatory proposal aimed at preventing and combating child sexual abuse online (the CSAM Regulation). Successive drafts, debated since 2022, would have allowed authorities to issue messaging providers with orders to scan private messages — potentially including those protected by end-to-end encryption — for material depicting child abuse.

The regulation's goal — protecting children from exploitation — is unquestionably right. How successive drafts proposed achieving it is what drew opposition from a large part of the digital security community, because mass-scanning private communication — even in good faith — in practice requires either breaking end-to-end encryption or scanning content on the user's device before it's even encrypted (client-side scanning). Critics argue both approaches create a backdoor that could eventually be used more broadly than originally intended.

The proposal has repeatedly been rejected or sent back for further work in the EU Council precisely because of these concerns. The debate is ongoing — and this matters: REVANGE doesn't assume Chat Control will pass in its most controversial form. It assumes that regardless of how that debate ends, it's worth having an alternative run by an independent, smaller team rather than one global tech giant.
WHY IT MATTERS FOR MESSENGERS

The problem isn't the intent — it's the architecture

01

Centralized operators = a single point of pressure

When your messages flow through one large company's infrastructure, that company is the sole target of legal orders. Change the law in one jurisdiction, and you change the rules for millions of people at once.

02

Scanning "before encryption" is still a backdoor

Scanning content on-device before it's encrypted technically bypasses the protection E2EE provides — the message has already been analyzed before it ever leaves the phone.

03

An independent operator is a smaller, harder target

REVANGE doesn't belong to any global tech conglomerate. A single regulatory decision or pressure from one government doesn't change the rules for a billion people at once — and end-to-end encryption stays the default regardless of what happens to other platforms.

WHAT REVANGE DOES

A technical answer, not a legal one

We want to be fully honest here: REVANGE isn't a legal shield, and we don't claim any messenger is "immune" to future law in any jurisdiction. What we actually provide:

🔐

End-to-end encryption from day one

Messages and voice calls are end-to-end encrypted by default, not as an optional add-on.

🛰️

Independent infrastructure

REVANGE Community runs on our own infrastructure, outside the big platforms' ecosystem — no ads, no data sales as a business model.

🇵🇱

Built in Poland

An independent project, built without investors and without a business model based on selling data.